Evaluate the extent to which urban regeneration projects in the UK have successfully addressed social and economic inequalities. [12 marks]
AO1 (published assessment objective): Identify and interpret explicit and implicit information and ideas; select and synthesise evidence from different texts (English Language). For Literature: read, understand and respond to texts, maintaining a critical style, developing an informed personal response, and using textual references including quotations to support and illustrate interpretations. For Geography: demonstrate knowledge of locations, places, processes, environments and different scales. For History: demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the key features and characteristics of the periods studied.
AO2 (published assessment objective): Explain, comment on and analyse how writers use language and structure to achieve effects and influence readers, using relevant subject terminology to support their views (English). For Geography: demonstrate geographical understanding of concepts and how they are used in relation to places, environments and processes, and the interrelationships between places, environments and processes. For History: explain and analyse historical events and periods studied using second-order historical concepts.
AO3 (published assessment objective): Compare writers' ideas and perspectives, as well as how these are conveyed, across two or more texts (English Language). For Literature: show understanding of the relationships between texts and the contexts in which they were written. For Geography: apply knowledge and understanding to interpret, analyse and evaluate geographical information and issues to make judgements. For History: analyse, evaluate and use sources (contemporary to the period) to make substantiated judgements.
Assessed against AO1, AO2, AO3 using Revision Robin's own level descriptors below. These are not the exam board's mark scheme. Every quotation in the feedback is checked against your answer before you see it, and a teacher's mark overrides ours.
| Level 3 · 7 to 12 | A detailed and comprehensive evaluation demonstrating a thorough understanding of urban regeneration and its impacts on social and economic inequalities. Specific, accurate, and detailed place-specific information and data are used effectively to support a well-developed and sustained argument. Judgements are perceptive and fully justified, leading to a strong conclusion. The response is well-structured and uses geographical terminology appropriately and consistently. |
| Level 2 · 4 to 6 | A clear evaluation demonstrating a sound understanding of urban regeneration and some of its impacts on social and economic inequalities. Place-specific information and data are used, though perhaps with less detail or accuracy, to support a structured argument. Judgements are made and generally justified, leading to a conclusion. Geographical terminology is used appropriately. |
| Level 1 · 1 to 3 | A basic evaluation demonstrating limited understanding of urban regeneration and its impacts. Place-specific information may be limited, generic, or inaccurate. Arguments are simple and lack structure or support. Conclusions, if present, are unsupported. Limited or inappropriate use of geographical terminology. |