All examsWritten answers
GCSE English Language · Edexcel style · Paper 1 Section A, Question 4 style
Evaluating Presentation of Buck's Privileged, Contented Life (The Call of the Wild)
AO415 marks · about 22 minutes

In this extract, there is an attempt to present Buck's life at Judge Miller's place as one of privilege and contentment. Evaluate how successfully this is achieved. Support your views with detailed reference to the text. [15 marks]

Read the extract, then write below it.
Buck did not read the newspapers, or he would have known that trouble was brewing, not alone for himself, but for every tide-water dog, strong of muscle and with warm, long hair, from Puget Sound to San Diego. Because men, groping in the Arctic darkness, had found a yellow metal, and because steamship and transportation companies were booming the find, thousands of men were rushing into the Northland. These men wanted dogs, and the dogs they wanted were heavy dogs, with strong muscles by which to toil, and furry coats to protect them from the frost. Buck lived at a big house in the sun-kissed Santa Clara Valley. Judge Miller’s place, it was called. It stood back from the road, half hidden among the trees, through which glimpses could be caught of the wide cool veranda that ran around its four sides. The house was approached by gravelled driveways which wound about through wide-spreading lawns and under the interlacing boughs of tall poplars. At the rear things were on even a more spacious scale than at the front. There were great stables, where a dozen grooms and boys held forth, rows of vine-clad servants’ cottages, an endless and orderly array of outhouses, long grape arbors, green pastures, orchards, and berry patches. Then there was the pumping plant for the artesian well, and the big cement tank where Judge Miller’s boys took their morning plunge and kept cool in the hot afternoon. And over this great demesne Buck ruled. Here he was born, and here he had lived the four years of his life. It was true, there were other dogs. There could not but be other dogs on so vast a place, but they did not count. They came and went, resided in the populous kennels, or lived obscurely in the recesses of the house after the fashion of Toots, the Japanese pug, or Ysabel, the Mexican hairless,—strange creatures that rarely put nose out of doors or set foot to ground. On the other hand, there were the fox terriers, a score of them at least, who yelped fearful promises at Toots and Ysabel looking out of the windows at them and protected by a legion of housemaids armed with brooms and mops. But Buck was neither house-dog nor kennel-dog. The whole realm was his. He plunged into the swimming tank or went hunting with the Judge’s sons; he escorted Mollie and Alice, the Judge’s daughters, on long twilight or early morning rambles; on wintry nights he lay at the Judge’s feet before the roaring library fire; he carried the Judge’s grandsons on his back, or rolled them in the grass, and guarded their footsteps through wild adventures down to the fountain in the stable yard, and even beyond, where the paddocks were, and the berry patches. Among the terriers he stalked imperiously, and Toots and Ysabel he utterly ignored, for he was king,—king over all creeping, crawling, flying things of Judge Miller’s place, humans included.
Source: Jack London, The Call of the Wild (1903). Public domain.
0 words · saved on this device as you type
How this is marked

AO4 (published assessment objective): Evaluate texts critically and support this with appropriate textual references (English Language). For Literature: use a range of vocabulary and sentence structures for clarity, purpose and effect, with accurate spelling and punctuation.

Assessed against AO4 using Revision Robin's own level descriptors below. These are not the exam board's mark scheme. Every quotation in the feedback is checked against your answer and the extract before you see it, and a teacher's mark overrides ours.

Level 4 · 12 to 15Perceptive, critical evaluation. Takes a clear, developed view on the statement; shows how the writer's methods create the effects claimed; a convincing range of precise textual references; weighs the statement rather than simply agreeing.
Level 3 · 9 to 11Clear, relevant evaluation. Takes a clear view and supports it with relevant references; explains how methods produce effects; mostly convincing.
Level 2 · 5 to 8Some attempt at evaluation. Expresses an opinion with some supporting reference; comments on method are general or thin.
Level 1 · 1 to 4Simple, limited evaluation. Agrees or disagrees with little support; mostly retells the extract.